Anything spanning time is made up of a beginning, a middle and an end – any doomed relationship, punchy fantasy football season, balls-achingly dull seminar, quad bike ride across the Transvaal, request for another latte, rise and fall of a trans-continental empire, beat of a weimaraner puppy’s heart, or 6’3 walking-talking badger’s quest to write a Hollywood movie… they all comprise a beginning, a middle and an end.
Any story breaks down exactly the same, into those same three sections, or as they’re known in dramatic terminology: ‘Acts’. When applied to a screenplay these three Acts are imaginatively entitled Act I (the beginning), Act II (the middle) and Act III (the end). These three Acts, and the turning points between them, must be mastered by an author structuring a tale.
Act I introduces the key elements of the story. These include its world (place, time, etc), its genre or feel (comedy, action, thriller, etc), and its major characters (notably the heroic protagonist and villainous antagonist). Furthermore Act I identifies a ‘flaw’ in the protagonist, to be later addressed through pursuing a ‘goal’ (that ‘flaw’ represents a ‘need’ to be inadvertently resolved through chasing a ‘want’). The ‘goal’ (the hero’s ‘mission’) is also introduced in Act I, through a particularly insightful incident. From this comprehensive introduction the scene is set.
In Act II the protagonist starts trying on a new persona, skill or scenario in pursuit of that goal they’re now committed to, while the nasty antagonist throws obstacles into their path. Act II is therefore a boiling sea of conflict and tension in which villainous challenges test the growing hero, who tastes success, but also failure. The comfortable old world of Act I appeals at times of disheartening failure, but the call of the quest is strong, so the hero gets up and goes on, honing their arsenal for an ultimate showdown. Through Act II the grip of past weakness loosens, and heroic development is steeled and strengthened in readiness for a grand finale.
Act III provides that finale, concluding the tale by finally fixing the protagonist’s flaw, as the world of Act I is banished forever in favor of a new improved version going forward. This all-important transition is sealed through the ultimate defeat of the antagonist, served with a twist for dramatic panache. The journey, and growth that comes with it, is therefore complete, and all manner of other loose ends are also tied up (seeds sewn in earlier Acts are harvested here). Act III lays all open issues to rest, in glorious conclusion.
So there it is, as simple as that… almost. Act II, the middle, can be a muddle, and is twice as long as its straddling counterparts. Purist ponds bubble with the question of whether it should indeed be considered just one Act at all. Most agree that its central point (the centre of the entire movie) must be marked by a notable event (typically a false high or low for the hero, as a taste of things to come) but whether this marks the boundary between two distinct Acts (“Middle” and “More Middle” as some say) continues to fire academic discourse. The point is largely moot, and best left to the mass debaters.
Absolutely unquestioned is the importance of the events marking the turning points between Acts I & II, and II & III. In the former the hero having identified the goal has shied from it, debated it, and eventually at this key juncture commits to its pursuit. Here they lock themselves in, by openly declaring that the world of Act I just won’t do, so a journey of growth will be embarked upon. This is the “Let’s do this thing” moment.
The break from Act II to III comes deep into the quest, after the villain has spat out all manner of venom bringing the hero down to stare into the cold dead abyss of defeat… from here the hero’s new qualities must mature, harmonize and gloriously emerge with a plan of attack to take forward through resurrection into the final showdown. This is the “Let’s finish this thing” moment.
So in its biggest chunks a screenplay, like anything else, is just a beginning, middle and end. These three Acts are divided by easily identifiable key events, with another such event bang in the middle of the middle. These three points of definition are the first that an author must identify when laying out the story to be told… they are the three key pegs on the timeline of the tale…
…but more must follow… this particular story is still very much at the beginning.



















